Interview results were almost the exact same across all three participants with three major sentiments coming up. First, participants expressed that they thought the concept and execution of our product was neat implying that they believed the system was real, “Definitely really interesting, nothing I've used before”(P2). With the exception of P3 who specifically stated they thought someone was controlling the device, but thought it was cool anyway. Second, participants found voice control inconvenient, specifically mentioning the effort required to think of a move, figure out how to explain it either through rough terms or using a grid, and then say their command. Participants and peers mentioned that this process would be significantly easier with some sort of grid system, “Something I would recommend is if it's going to be a vocalized game, you need to have a grid that says what each of the spaces are so that someone can input quickly.” We had considered this when designing our prototype but decided against it as we thought it would limit the variety of commands participants would use. Third, the concept was not desirable. All participants indicated that they would not use a voice control system for Plants vs Zombies citing the system's inconvenience. Some participants proposed potential use cases, perhaps if someone were unable to use their hands to control the game. But our success criteria was broader desirability, which we failed to achieve.